Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Parasit Vectors ; 15(1): 78, 2022 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1789129

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study explored the effect of a continuous mitigation and containment strategy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on five vector-borne diseases (VBDs) in China from 2020 to 2021. METHODS: Data on VBDs from 2015 to 2021 were obtained from the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, and the actual trend in disease activity in 2020-2021 was compared with that in 2015-2019 using a two-ratio Z-test and two proportional tests. Similarly, the estimated trend in disease activity was compared with the actual trend in disease activity in 2020. RESULTS: There were 13,456 and 3684 average yearly cases of VBDs in 2015-2019 and 2020, respectively. This represents a decrease in the average yearly incidence of total VBDs of 72.95% in 2020, from 0.9753 per 100,000 population in 2015-2019 to 0.2638 per 100,000 population in 2020 (t = 75.17, P < 0.001). The observed morbidity rates of the overall VBDs were significantly lower than the predicted rates (47.04% reduction; t = 31.72, P < 0.001). The greatest decline was found in dengue, with a 77.13% reduction (observed rate vs predicted rate: 0.0574 vs. 0.2510 per 100,000; t = 41.42, P < 0.001). Similarly, the average yearly mortality rate of total VBDs decreased by 77.60%, from 0.0064 per 100,000 population in 2015-2019 to 0.0014 per 100,000 population in 2020 (t = 6.58, P < 0.001). A decreasing trend was also seen in the monthly incidence of total VBDs in 2021 compared to 2020 by 43.14% (t = 5.48, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study verify that the mobility and mortality rates of VBDs significantly decreased from 2015-2019 to 2020-2021, and that they are possibly associated to the continuous COVID-19 mitigation and contamination strategy implemented in China in 2020-2021.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epidemics , Vector Borne Diseases , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , China/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Vector Borne Diseases/prevention & control
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 1748, 2022 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1671626

ABSTRACT

African horse sickness is a vector-borne, non-contagious and highly infectious disease of equines caused by African horse sickness viruses (AHSv) that mainly affect horses. The occurrence of the disease causes huge economic impacts because of its high fatality rate, trade ban and disease control costs. In the planning of vectors and vector-borne diseases like AHS, the application of Ecological niche models (ENM) used an enormous contribution in precisely delineating the suitable habitats of the vector. We developed an ENM to delineate the global suitability of AHSv based on retrospective outbreak data records from 2005 to 2019. The model was developed in an R software program using the Biomod2 package with an Ensemble modeling technique. Predictive environmental variables like mean diurnal range, mean precipitation of driest month(mm), precipitation seasonality (cv), mean annual maximum temperature (oc), mean annual minimum temperature (oc), mean precipitation of warmest quarter(mm), mean precipitation of coldest quarter (mm), mean annual precipitation (mm), solar radiation (kj /day), elevation/altitude (m), wind speed (m/s) were used to develop the model. From these variables, solar radiation, mean maximum temperature, average annual precipitation, altitude and precipitation seasonality contributed 36.83%, 17.1%, 14.34%, 7.61%, and 6.4%, respectively. The model depicted the sub-Sahara African continent as the most suitable area for the virus. Mainly Senegal, Burkina Faso, Niger, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Madagascar and Malawi are African countries identified as highly suitable countries for the virus. Besides, OIE-listed disease-free countries like India, Australia, Brazil, Paraguay and Bolivia have been found suitable for the virus. This model can be used as an epidemiological tool in planning control and surveillance of diseases nationally or internationally.


Subject(s)
African Horse Sickness Virus , African Horse Sickness , Ecosystem , Models, Statistical , Africa/epidemiology , African Horse Sickness/epidemiology , African Horse Sickness/transmission , Animals , Ceratopogonidae/virology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Horses , India/epidemiology , Insect Vectors/virology , Software , South Africa/epidemiology , South America/epidemiology , Temperature , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Vector Borne Diseases/transmission , Vector Borne Diseases/veterinary
3.
J Med Virol ; 94(1): 366-371, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1544350

ABSTRACT

Co-epidemics happening simultaneously can generate a burden on healthcare systems. The co-occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 with vector-borne diseases (VBD), such as malaria and dengue in resource-limited settings represents an additional challenge to the healthcare systems. Herein, we assessed the coinfection rate between SARS-CoV-2 and VBD to highlight the need to carry out an accurate diagnosis and promote timely measures for these infections in Luanda, the capital city of Angola. This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 105 subjects tested for the SARS-CoV-2 and VBD with a rapid detection test in April 2021. The participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (3.80%), malaria (13.3%), and dengue (27.6%). Low odds related to testing positivity to SARS-CoV-2 or VBD were observed in participants above or equal to 40 years (odds ratio [OR]: 0.60, p = 0.536), while higher odds were observed in male (OR: 1.44, p = 0.392) and urbanized areas (OR: 3.78, p = 0.223). The overall co-infection rate between SARS-CoV-2 and VBD was 11.4%. Our findings showed a coinfection between SARS-CoV-2 with malaria and dengue, which could indicate the need to integrate the screening for VBD in the SARS-CoV-2 testing algorithm and the adjustment of treatment protocols. Further studies are warranted to better elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 and VBD in Angola.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Dengue/epidemiology , Malaria/epidemiology , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Angola/epidemiology , Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Testing , Chikungunya Fever/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/blood , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sex Factors , Young Adult , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology
4.
J Med Virol ; 94(1): 393-398, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1372750

ABSTRACT

Dengue virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 coexist in dengue-endemic countries; therefore, the adoption of preventive measures is essential to control the spread of both viruses. We conducted an ecological study to compare the temporal patterns of the incidence of dengue before and during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Peru. A time-series analysis comparing the incidence of dengue using a Student's t test with variance correction was performed. Poisson regression was applied to determine the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of dengue before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The incidence of dengue was found to be increased in all endemic regions of Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the highest incidences registered in Ica (IRR = 90.14), Huánuco (IRR = 38.6), and Ucayali (IRR = 23.78), with the exception of Piura (IRR = 0.83). The highest increases in the number of dengue cases per million inhabitants were in Ucayali (393.38), Tumbes (233.19), Ica (166.08), and Loreto (129.93). The gradient of dengue cases was positive in all endemic regions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of dengue cases per million increased during the COVID-19 pandemic throughout Peru and in several endemic regions, with the exception of Piura.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Dengue/epidemiology , Dengue Virus/isolation & purification , Geography , Humans , Incidence , Peru/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology
5.
Viruses ; 13(6)2021 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1273518

ABSTRACT

We describe the impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on mosquito-borne diseases in Queensland, Australia, during the first half of 2020. Implementation of restrictions coincided with an atypical late season outbreak of Ross River virus (RRV) characterized by a peak in notifications in April (1173) and May (955) which were greater than 3-fold the mean observed for the previous four years. We propose that limitations on human movement likely resulted in the majority of RRV infections being acquired at or near the place of residence, and that an increase in outdoor activities, such as gardening and bushwalking in the local household vicinity, increased risk of exposure to RRV-infected mosquitoes. In contrast, the precipitous decline in international passenger flights led to a reduction in the number of imported dengue and malaria cases of over 70% and 60%, respectively, compared with the previous five years. This substantial reduction in flights also reduced a risk pathway for importation of exotic mosquitoes, but the risk posed by importation via sea cargo was not affected. Overall, the emergence of COVID-19 has had a varied impact on mosquito-borne disease epidemiology in Queensland, but the need for mosquito surveillance and control, together with encouragement of personal protective measures, remains unchanged.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Population Surveillance , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Alphavirus Infections/epidemiology , Alphavirus Infections/transmission , Animals , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Culicidae/virology , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Movement , Queensland/epidemiology , Travel , Vector Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Vector Borne Diseases/transmission
6.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(2): e0009109, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1207625

ABSTRACT

Public health institutions with sectorized structure and low integration among field teams, old-fashioned practices such as paper-based storage system, and poorly qualified health agents have limited ability to conduct accurate surveillance and design effective timely interventions. Herein, we describe the steps taken by the Zoonosis Control Center of Foz do Iguaçu (CCZ-Foz) in the last 23 years to move from an archaic and sectorized structure to a modern and timely surveillance program embracing zoonotic diseases, venomous animal injuries, and vector-borne diseases epidemiology under the One Health approach. The full implementation of the One Health approach was based on 5 axes: (1) merging sectorized field teams; (2) adoption of digital solutions; (3) health agents empowerment and permanent capacitation; (4) social mobilization; and (5) active surveys. By doing so, notifications related to zoonotic diseases and venomous animals increased 10 and 21 times, respectively, with no impairment on arbovirus surveillance (major concern in the city). Open sources database (PostgreSQL) and software (QGis) are daily updated and create real-time maps to support timely decisions. The adoption of One Health approach increased preparedness for endemic diseases and reemerging and emerging threats such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , One Health , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Animals , Brazil , Databases, Factual , Geographic Information Systems , Humans , Organizations/organization & administration
7.
Public Health Res Pract ; 30(4)2020 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-969941

ABSTRACT

Mosquitoes and mosquito-borne disease are a normal part of the Australian summer but the 2019-2020 summer was anything but normal. Above average temperatures and below average rainfall resulted in drought across many parts of New South Wales (NSW), Australia, which then contributed to catastrophic bushfires. However, by late summer, above average rainfall resulted in a dramatic increase in mosquito abundance. While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic unfolded, NSW experienced increased activity of mosquito-borne Ross River virus. All these extreme events created many challenges for managing the pest and the public health risks associated with mosquitoes, from maintenance of mosquito monitoring and control programs through to unique challenges of communicating mosquito bite prevention advice to local communities. There are important lessons to be learned in situations where extreme weather events may influence the risk of mosquito-borne disease through driving changes in the abundance and diversity of mosquito populations, while also influencing the abundance and distribution of native wildlife that represents important local reservoirs of arboviruses. Similarly, supporting the maintenance of mosquito monitoring and management programs while local authorities face competing priorities due to extreme natural disasters and/or public health events is critical.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Mosquito Vectors/virology , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Wildfires/statistics & numerical data , Alphavirus Infections/epidemiology , Animals , Disasters , Humans , Mosquito Control , New South Wales/epidemiology , Pandemics , Public Health , Ross River virus , SARS-CoV-2 , Seasons , Vector Borne Diseases/virology , Weather
8.
Health Commun ; 35(14): 1707-1710, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-883019

ABSTRACT

The emergence of viral diseases such as Ebola virus disease, Zika virus disease, and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed considerable challenges to health care systems around the world. Public health strategy to address emerging infectious diseases has depended in part on human behavior change and yet the perceptions and knowledge motivating that behavior have been at times inconsistent with the latest consensus of peer-reviewed science. Part of that disjuncture likely involves the existence and persistence of past ideas about other diseases. To forecast and prepare for future epidemic and pandemic response, we need to better understand how people approach emerging infectious diseases as objects of public opinion during the periods when such diseases first become salient at a population level. In this essay, we explore two examples of how existing mental models of past infectious diseases appear to have conditioned and constrained public response to novel viral diseases. We review previously reported experiences related to Zika virus in Central America and discuss public opinion data collected in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the case of Zika virus disease, we assess how thinking about earlier mosquito-borne disease seems to have affected public consideration of the virus in Guatemala. In the case of COVID-19, we assess how previous vaccination behavior for a different disease is associated with intention to obtain vaccination for COVID-19 in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Models, Psychological , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Zika Virus Infection/psychology , COVID-19 Vaccines/psychology , Guatemala/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , Mosquito Vectors , Pandemics , Public Opinion , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Vector Borne Diseases/psychology
9.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 12640, 2020 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-690878

ABSTRACT

Aedes-borne diseases, such as dengue and chikungunya, are responsible for more than 50 million infections worldwide every year, with an overall increase of 30-fold in the last 50 years, mainly due to city population growth, more frequent travels and ecological changes. In the United States of America, the vast majority of Aedes-borne infections are imported from endemic regions by travelers, who can become new sources of mosquito infection upon their return home if the exposed population is susceptible to the disease, and if suitable environmental conditions for the mosquitoes and the virus are present. Since the susceptibility of the human population can be determined via periodic monitoring campaigns, the environmental suitability for the presence of mosquitoes and viruses becomes one of the most important pieces of information for decision makers in the health sector. We present a next-generation monitoring and forecasting system for [Formula: see text]-borne diseases' environmental suitability (AeDES) of transmission in the conterminous United States and transboundary regions, using calibrated ento-epidemiological models, climate models and temperature observations. After analyzing the seasonal predictive skill of AeDES, we briefly consider the recent Zika epidemic, and the compound effects of the current Central American dengue outbreak happening during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, to illustrate how a combination of tailored deterministic and probabilistic forecasts can inform key prevention and control strategies .


Subject(s)
Aedes/virology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Mosquito Vectors/virology , Vector Borne Diseases/pathology , Animals , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Climate , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Databases, Factual , Decision Making , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vector Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Vector Borne Diseases/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL